mirror of
https://github.com/avinal/avinal.github.io.git
synced 2026-07-03 23:30:09 +05:30
2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
category, date, description, image, tags, title
| category | date | description | image | tags | title | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gsoc | 2021-07-23T22:22:00 | This week I implemented CMake packaging configuration for FOSSology. There were two meetings in this week and this report covers both of them. | /images/tech-wallpaper-9.webp |
|
Coding Week 7 Meeting |
This week I implemented CMake packaging configuration for FOSSology. There were two meetings in this week and this report covers both of them.
Week 7 Progress
Initial CMake packaging configuration implemented.
- Packages can be built according to the FOSSology previous packaging structure.
- Copyright, ecc and keyword now builds faster.
- To test the current progress, follow the instructions here
Discussions
- Where I can find packaging info for FOSSology?
- All the scripts and companion files are located inside
debianfolder. - The most important files are
control, which contains the dependency and description of each package, andrulesfile, which contains the make commands for creating the packages.
- All the scripts and companion files are located inside
- What are
${shlibs:Depends}and${misc:Depends}?- They are dependencies required for creating Debian packages. CMake should be adding them by default so we can safely ignore them.
- Will the new packages have the same structure as the old ones?
(Michael)
- Yes for compatibility purposes Gaurav has suggested exactly follow the same structure as the old one.
- Copyright build is slow because the same object files are being
compiled three times, can you improve that? (Gaurav)
- I can try compiling the common object files beforehand and then adding the executables. But how to know the common object files?
- Gaurav showed me where in the Makefiles I can find the common object files.
- There are problems with copying the symbolic link and packaging them. So I have to find some alternatives to resolve that.
- With component installing, package description can no longer be set.
- The
fossology-commonpackage contains file fromfossology-dbpackage. And thefossology-dbpackage is empty.- Gaurav said this was unexpected and should not happen. This seems to be a very old bug with packaging.
Conclusion and Further Plans
- Work more on the packaging.
- Improve compilation of copyright and monk agents
- Try to solve the packaging bug and add a pull request for that.
- Move on to implementing testing configurations.