added hugo website

Signed-off-by: Avinal Kumar <avinal.xlvii@gmail.com>

rh-pre-commit.version: 2.2.0
rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED

blog/content/posts/gsoc/meeting-6.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+---
+category: gsoc
+date: 2021-07-02T22:22:00
+description: In this eighth meeting questions related to post install generation were
+  asked. This was a short meeting.
+image: /images/tech-wallpaper-7.webp
+tags:
+- gsoc
+- FOSSology
+title: Coding Week 4 Meeting-2
+---
+
+In this eighth meeting questions related to post install generation were asked. This was a short meeting.  
+
+## Week 4 Progress
+
+> Version parsing logic implemented.
+>
+> - VERSION and COMMIT_HASH added to every executables.
+> - Installing part is complete except `cli`.
+> - Symbolic Links are installing and working fine.
+> - Version, Symbolic Links, `VERSION` file generation, `version.php` generation are now more modular and called via a single function for each agent
+> - Most dependencies are now moved to single configuration file.
+> - Vendor directory generation and installing are now working.
+> - To test the current progress, follow the instructions [here](https://github.com/avinal/FOSSology/wiki#test-the-new-system-only-gcc-with-make-and-ninja-tested-for-now)
+
+## Discussions
+
+- **Why all the symbolic links in cli points to** `fo_wrapper`
+  **script?**
+  - The `fo_wrapper` script calls the PHP script on the symbolic link
+    that called the fo_wrapper. It also initializes any requirement
+    before calling the scripts.
+- **How to generate all the other configuration in**
+  `/usr/local/etc/fossology` **directory?**
+  - You can find the input files for all these configurations in the
+    `install/defcon` directory.
+- **What are** `OBSOLETEFILES` **in** `www/ui/Makefile` **?**
+  - They are kept for compatibility purposes. Although they have been
+    removed in the current versions of FOSSology, if a user installs a
+    new version on top of an older instance, then we should explicitly
+    remove those files.
+- **I have created a separate folder for generating vendor directory. Is
+  that okay?**
+  - Yeah, it should be fine, But it would be better to rename it to
+    something else. Or even better if moved to *www* itself. Since these
+    files are used by www.
+
+## Conclusion and Further Plans
+
+- Move `vendor` scripts to `www` directory.
+- Implement installing for FOSSology cli.
+- Implement installing configuration scripts.
+- Finish installation for testing
+
+## Attendees
+
+- [Gaurav Mishra](https://github.com/GMishx)
+- [Avinal Kumar](https://github.com/avinal)